This week I'm going to share the policy I've been following since my first Tweet in April 2009. It works well for me. You can adopt this policy for yourself or not, as you wish.
Ready? It's really straightforward.
I follow everyone back on Twitter. (Just about).
There, that's my policy. Here's why:
1. For whatever odd reason, Twitter limits how many people a person follows. If you follow a bunch of "celebrities" and news outlets that don't follow you back, you'll hit a wall at 2,000 where you find you can't follow anyone else. And even if your follow-followee ratio is close enough that Twitter lets you slip past this stupid, arbitrary wall of 2,000, you still have to stay within a close ratio to continue following more people. So any time you don't follow someone back, you're limiting who else they can follow. That's not nice. Be nice.
2. The friend who introduced me to Twitter explained that automatically following back is the ethic of the medium. It's what you do, he said. A lot of us still act that way, and so this rule has served me well in making some really cool friends and acquaintances along the way.
3. In this way, Twitter is pretty much the opposite of Facebook and LinkedIn, where everyone's always asking, "Do I know you?" This open, "We're all friends here" culture really works for me. I'm friendly in real life - I'm like a Labrador Retriever - and Twitter lets me be friendly online as well.
4. Much more importantly (to me), here's why I follow everyone back: I'm not more important than my followers. Indeed, I'm grateful every single time a person complements me by following me. It's their way of saying, "Hi Ted! I want to get to know you better." For me to snub their kindness would be ungracious - and if I were ungracious, I couldn't look my Mother in the eye. [I'm on a lifelong crusade against arrogance. We'll leave it at that.]
5. On that last point, following back is consistent with my status as a customer service author and leader. How on earth can I tell people to provide Five-Star Customer Service, which is based entirely on manners, when I am impolite myself? So for me, it's an easy decision.
I know some of you will find these to be strong words, especially that last part. Let me repeat: this is MY follow-back policy. These are my reasons. You may have perfectly legitimate reasons for not observing my practices, and I'm sure they work for you.
Now, it's time for the caveats:
6. When I follow a new person, I typically give them a week, maybe two, to follow me back. If they don't choose to, that perfectly fine. But at that point I unfollow them. I literally do not follow a single human who does not follow me as well - at least not for more than a week. No one is that important to me.
7. I use a client (Tweetdeck) to manage my Twitter stream. I basically ignore my "All Friends" feed. Instead I set up columns on Tweetdeck that search for key words, hashtags I enjoy, or for lists of special people - my core friends. I recommend you try something similar.
8. I regularly check in with Tweepi to manage my list, and to find new people to follow who share my interests, which are mostly business, leadership, social media, and customer service.
9. Tweepi is great. It lets me find and follow people with similar interests. You can see when they last tweeted, so you can only follow active Tweeters. You can unfollow accounts that are clearly spambots or that have become inactive. Poke around the site. There's a lot to learn.
10. One last thing: do I follow wack-jobs, which to me includes some members of fringe political and/or religious groups that offend me? Hmn. I'm always wrestling with this, but typically yes. I figure engagement is a great way to find common ground with those whose views are different from mine. Often, even if their beliefs in one area make me squirm, in many other respects we find all sorts of common ground. If they really, truly alienate me with their tweets, then yes, they're out. That's pretty rare, though.
Okay, that's this week's short (*ehem*) write-up of my follow-back policy for Twitter. I'm really interested in your comments. I know this one in particular is not universally agreed upon. Let me have it, if you feel so inclined. My favorite thing about Social Media in general is that I'm always learning.
Thanks for the Tweepi tip, I am trying it out.
ReplyDeleteI mostly agree with your policy, caveat #1 included.
But I differ in that I do follow some people/companies who do not follow me back, because I find them a useful resource (e.g. @mashable, @techcrunch, @smashingmag etc.)
I guess what you're saying is that *they* should be following me back.
I don't care, as long as I get value from them.
Hi Ted,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this post and agree with your policy on following people back, I think it is just good business. I am sure glad I chose to follow you back as you have a lot of good information to share. Thanks.
Thank you for the great post - funny & informative :)
ReplyDeleteTed: interesting to hear - and I like the fact that as a customer service professional, you follow people back! An Eigen Value! A self-defining feature that would be out of place if it weren't there. Makes sense to me.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I have one rule for Twitter: "Read What You Like." I hope people like what I tweet - they usually find me through mutual friends or chats. And reciprocally, if I like what they tweet, I'm on board with following them too. If I tweet "marketing" and they tweet "real estate in New York," I don't follow back - and that's OK (I think), because they might really want to follow marketing while I don't need NY real estate help. The same goes for the legions of sports writers, politicos and others I follow who don't follow me back. I read what I like. Hope everyone does that, too!
Thanks - enjoy our conversations -
Hi Ted, some great points there. My approach, however, is somewhat different.
ReplyDeleteWhen I joined Twitter in July 2007 it was a much smaller network. There were no concerns about max follower counts, because nobody came anywhere near 2000. One of the most refreshing things about Twitter in the early days was that it didn't have the Facebook caveat of mutual consent. Whilst it might sound arrogant to assume that there are those who wish to follow me who I don't wish to follow, the evidence seems to speak for itself (I have no idea why, my tweets aren't that great).
My single main reason for not following people automatically is that I read my timeline. All of it. What is the point in following someone if there aren't enough hours in the day to read what they are writing? That isn't a relationship to me, that's passing someone on a crowded street. I prefer to follow only as many people as I can follow properly and interact with.
I prefer social networking to be about quality, not quantity of relationships. But hey, I seem to be in a minority on this one :-)
The single best bit about this article? The following:
ReplyDelete"Let me repeat: this is MY follow-back policy. These are my reasons. You may have perfectly legitimate reasons for not observing my practices, and I'm sure they work for you."
It's too rare to find someone with firm beliefs based on principles who is also broad-minded enough to accept that it's OK for others to do things differently. A "liberal" approach, in the philosophical rather than political use of the word.
I use a slightly different approach, which works for me, and which fortunately allowed me to come across you on twitter. The main difference being that I'm content to follow some people who don't follow me back. I read them because I like what they say; the feeling doesn't have to be mutual!
Thanks, Ted, for the great information.
ReplyDeleteI look at every person who follows me with the intention of following them back. I also always send a DM that thanks them for following me, and include something about their latest tweets, interests or web site.
The only time that I do not follow someone is if it is a SPAMbot. You can quickly see these as the ones who have only nonsensical phrases as their tweets or their activity is not what a person or business would post. I do not feel that following those accounts is worth my time or effort.
Thankyou , Ted for grear information
ReplyDeleteHi Ted,
ReplyDeleteThanks for laying out your thoughts on this subject - I wholehartedly agree with your policy, and practice it myself. As I'm new to twitter I have to learn a lot, and highly appreciate every positive input.
In particular I liked your statement: "[I'm on a lifelong crusade against arrogance. We'll leave it at that.]" High five on this one! :-)
Have a great day!
I missed this one :-)
ReplyDeleteA few places I differ? I know a few people that keep the main stream a little clearer by using lists, and then following the lists.
Second, I don't automatically follow. 0 tweets but 200 follows? MLM Marketing Guru? Make $$$ online? SEO/SEM Guru?
Nope - I look at the stream of all followers for someting I might learn. I like learning.
:-)
I think the key here is using the separate tweet stream capabilities on tweetdeck.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I can agree with the exception of twitterbots.
Ted, great to see someone with manners and an open mind. I take a little more care in whom I follow. A bio helps to give me an understanding of where the person is coming from and whether they're human.
ReplyDeleteMy first foray into social media was years ago with MySpace. The free-for-all culture eventually became meaningless to me. Since I'm a B2B marketer, I need to find relevance so that I can be relevant. Realizing that seemingly unrelated disciplines can have impact (see Steve Jobs' Stanford speech), I either try to see what they're about or who's in their galaxy of influence.
My Facebook galaxy is distinct from my LinkedIn galaxy which has its own character. My Twitter galaxy has its own flavor. Each serves a particular purpose.
That's what works for me.
All the best.
Hi, saw your user name on I Love Own about this policy...I absolutely love this policy...its makes great sense and it allows for you to touch everyone with your knowledge and vice versa.Happy tweeting.
ReplyDeletethanks for following @asciiART. Probably you are interested too in my "APPROVED AUTO* follow back" accounts @2000follower , @1kfollower + @followrate with in the moment ~3000 /followING
ReplyDelete─────██████████════█
* all AUTO-following via socialOOMPH
Hi Ted, I agree with your policy on follow back but like Lino Zaprouti, I too follow some companies and celebbrities as their tweets add value to me.
ReplyDeleteI am following you back now:)
Ted,
ReplyDeleteI love to see people providing straight-forward explanations of their personal social media policy. I've done the same http://bit.ly/dSN08F.
What works for one doesn't necessarily work for all. In this case, I don't necessarily follow everyone back, and I explain my reasons. Thanks for the insightful post!
Hi Ted,
ReplyDeleteI like your way of treating other tweeps.
However, in the Netherlands where I live, a lot of companies follow tweeps and when these tweeps follow back, they unfollow again.
So they try to get a lot of followers in not a friendly way.
That's why I only follow seriously tweeps back.
I have pretty much the same policy. I follow (almost) everyone that follows me. After someone follows me, I'll take a look at their bio, their timeline, and if something interests me (usually there's something in common - hence the reason they followed me in the first place), then I follow back. At times it's a spam account and they get a no-follow. Sometimes they get a report (depends on how I'm feeling or aggressive they are). I've found many new friends and people I converse with on a weekly basis.
ReplyDeleteYou make some very good points here. I have always given the follow-back more weight than interest in their output - often it can be limiting to just look at a few tweets and I will probably follow for a bit to see if there is any engagement. I very rarely initiate a follow unless they have engaged with me or there is a subject I am particularly interested in. I never follow just for the numbers. I often dont get round to unfollowing until I hit the no more follows rule and I have a purge of all the accounts that followed me for the follow back and then unfollowed as soon as I followed back.
ReplyDeleteI also usually wait a couple of weeks before following back. That way many who are following just for the auto-follow-back will probably have stopped following and wont need following back!
Great post. Fairly new to Twitter, but not so new to customer service. What you say makes perfect sense to me.
ReplyDeleteI really like the idea of managing w/lists & such... only been tweeting for a short time, bit gotta say the "ad streams" really get in the way as far as things I really want to read... and OK, I admit I read TheRlock's tweets but that's for different reasons :).
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to explain... very helpful. So, now where's the tutorial of how to type on a stinkin' smart phone with two hands?
-Jennifer P.
I like your outlook on this. I will say, however, that I do not follow back people who have never tweeted. I honestly don't know what to make of them. Why are they on Twitter? Interesting timing on this as I've been 'culling the herd' myself this morning.
ReplyDeleteGreat policy. Makes a lot of sense. I'm going to do the same.
ReplyDeleteI like your policy. I also have followed back everyone who follows me, with one exception: the person who wrote sexually graphic posts.
ReplyDeleteSometimes when I check out the person I'm about to follow back, I see that they have a large amount of followers, but a very low amount of follows. This is understandable, say, for Conan O'Brian, or the Bronx Zoo Cobra, or other celebrities, as they mostly get fans ready to drool over anything they tweet, whether it's relevant or intelligent or not.
But for non-celebrities, I don't really see what reason *cough*excuse*cough they have for avoiding reciprocity. I follow them back anyway, because hey, they did follow me, but I do feel a little disappointed at their stinginess.
Another thing I dislike are people on a blog hop that obviously haven't read a single post on the sites they visit, and just post a comment like: I'm here on the blog hop, I followed you, so now you should follow me.
I don't feel the purpose of the hop was solely to drive up traffic numbers. And if it was, then that's another disappointment.
Ah well. As long as there are those of us who practice reciprocity and generosity, the blogosphere will continue to thrive as something other than cannibalistic pirahnas in an enclosed tank.
I enjoyed your post and the bit about the political fringe was great, especially since it is not explicit. Please don't clarify. I love mystery.
ReplyDeleteIn light of your post please advise: I have one follower who has 1500 followers and they follow about the same but they have only 3 tweets. My mind sings suspicious. Would you follow them?
I really enjoyed and appreciated this post. I'm relatively new to this (8 weeks) and a large number of my follows come overnight...for my EST Timezone. I'm not sure why this is (I'm suspicious and curious) but follow back just the same. I just started a list and it's helping me to focus on those that I am truly trying to connect with. Thanks for the follow and I look forward to learning more! John
ReplyDeleteSeriously!? You'll follow me back as if you're interested in engaging but then actually just filter me out?
ReplyDeleteI only follow people if I actually want to follow their tweets. Otherwise you're just placing a wasted burden on Twitter.
I am always amused by people who 'follow' 12,000+ other people. You're not fooling anyone...
And no, if I find your tweets interesting enough to follow, I am not put out if you don't find mine interesting enough to follow. We're just not all interested in the same things.
Wow. I feel humbled. I'm going to move a little closer to your policy.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing that stops me following all non-spammers is that I really love to engage on Twitter and there are only so many hours in the day, meaning I can't have real engagement with high numbers.
But I will follow more, thank you.
Ted, it's speaks of two qualities that are unfortunately less and less on people, humility and consistency. If you have no problem I will adopt and copy your follow-back policy, it's sounds great for me. Thanks for the tip of Tweepi I allready start to use and is very good.
ReplyDeleteI follow a lot of Ted's ideas (and recently wrote about it in a blog post at SueMentors.blogspot.com).
ReplyDeleteI usually follow back everyone who follows me. More and more, however, I am being followed by individuals that are running businesses - and their tweets are only self-promotion about their business. If they don't add value (through interesting blog posts or advantageous links that expand my knowledge), I don't follow them.
But I thank everyone for following me - even these businesses.
I agree with your post, but I personally don't always follow everyone back. I follow the people that I do because I am a fan, or because they are inspirational. I do like your blog and feel that it is very informational. I am following you back.
ReplyDeleteI mean informative.
ReplyDeleteI follow back everyone who follows me as long as (a) they have at least one tweet to their name and (b) they're not obviously a bot.
ReplyDeleteThe difficulty is that I find followers tend to turn up in clumps (in the wake of Follow Friday recommendations or a particularly well RT's tweet).
Sometimes it's more bother than I can stand to look at 60-70 new profiles in a row and make a judgement on whether they're real or not.
In that case I pick people at random and hope for the best. Works for me.
An interesting article. As a general rule I follow any individual (as opposed to business, religious or other entity) who follows me and others who interest me that may not follow me. I do not encourage those hawking a product to follow me, and I don't want my followers bothered by commercial pitches in their interactions with me.
ReplyDeleteTerrible ideas here. Do not follow these.
ReplyDelete