Thursday, December 30, 2010

Not My Job Man

CEOs: how do you feel when you overhear one of your people say this line?

"It's not my job."

You see red, don't you? Or how about when you hear a sales guy say,

"That's manufacturing's problem."

I've witnessed that last one a lot in my career. The attitude is, sales will sell it, and engineering will have to figure out how to fulfill their promises. Or marketing will promise it, and customer service will have to handle the cascades of disgruntled customers who have basically been lied to. Or the company will produce it, and the resellers, or dealers, or channel partners will have to field all the service complaints because the product is deeply flawed.

Am I hitting a nerve? Is this something you, as CEO, have dealt with? Or maybe, something you are dealing with now, or something you always deal with, and have since your first days on your first job decades ago?

Earlier, I posted on the tension I've noticed in just about every organization between Marketing and Sales. Basically, they are coming at the same task from two very different perspectives. They often don't respect each other. Worse, they typically see each other as vying for the same finite resources, including the CEO's time, attention, and high regard.

Yesterday, I suggested that the problem was with the corporate pyramid itself, rather than with Sales or with Marketing.

Here, finally, is my humble solution. Well, my radical solution. But it's not one I made up myself. W.L. Gore has been using it for decades, and they are a highly successful privately held company. My guess is you, Mr. or Ms CEO, would be lucky to have their financial or operational success at your own company.

The answer? Do away with titles. Eliminate roles, and areas of responsibility. Instead, institute this culture shift: One company, one goal, with everyone working toward it.

Think about any organization, and what do you have? The very highest-ranking leader is a generalist: she is responsible for every function of the company, every single one!

Then, right below her on the org chart, what happens? Speciality. There's a head of finance. A head of manufacturing. Someone else in charge of sales, and a different person in charge of marketing. You've got Bob heading up IT, and Wanda in charge of people or "human resources." Don the legal council keeps you out of jail. Juan the sourcing guy deals with all the vendor contracts. I could go on, but I think you probably see my point.

Something goes wrong at your main data center? Everyone blames Bob. "Not my problem," the rest think, with a combination of relief and disgust. "Geek," some mutter under their breath. "What do we pay this guy for?" mutter others.

Sales start to tank? All eyes turn to John, the Senior VP of sales. "Let's get on it!" the rest of the company brays - as if the quality of the product doesn't matter at all, as if fulfillment of orders in a timely manner isn't a consideration, as if wild promises made in advertising have no bearing, as if employee churn and poor morale have nothing at all to do with why customers are wising up and fleeing the company in droves!

"Not my job" is completely unacceptable when uttered by a front line worker. So why is it so prevalent in the C-suite?


9 comments:

  1. Very strong point, Ted! I loved reading this and recognize a lot of it. Especially your point about a common sense of responsibility. Are we feeling responsible for our own area/domain/tasks/etc. or do we feel part of one common purpose where we depend on each other? Creating this culture shift starts at the very top with a C-suite is capable of breaking down 'silo-thinking' among themselves.
    Keep feeding us with these thought provoking posts!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The way I see it, if everyone just takes the attitude: Make everyone else in the organization look like a superstar, titles/organizational roles, etc are irrelevant.

    If that's the culture fostered, when an issue arises, everyone will work towards a solution and take responsbility instead of passing the buck.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post Ted. The accountability/responsibility issues you raise were certainly prevalent across the operations I have led...I have however 'beaten' that out of all I came into contact with!! I wish I could as rapidly effect change in service industries for whom I do not represent. Yeah, I complain and raise the "potential for training opportunities" -to companies whose staff fail to take corporate responsibility.

    Whilst I agree that removing obvious hierarchy can be an effective solution,I also believe it takes a special matrix leadership to implement and maintain the consistency necessary.

    I feel quite strongly that it is very much about effective communications to bring about efficient cultural paradigm shifts.
    Definitely something I aspire to bring about in any environment I have contact with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well said! Rather than playing the "pass the buck" game people within the company need to take an overall ownership of the company itself. Now, it does need to start from the top and the ones at the top need to make it worth the employees (teams) efforts by treating them accordingly and making sure that the people in place are paid adequately. But that is another article, LOL.
    I love the philosophy. I give it two thumbs up.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I must admit this is one of my pet peeves about being in an office. Being a sole entrepreneur now I don't have that problem, but as a contractor I have. I was a technical writer, but did support on Fridays as the department had no formal support and rotated between 5 people, i.e. I always did Friday. I can't tell you how many times I ended up doing the support from Thursday because the system analyst / programmer was too good, too busy to do it. Nevermind me having 200+ documents to support on my own.

    The holier-than-thou attitude some people take always gets under my skin. I don't mind doing support on occasion although I wouldn't want it to be my main job. I've even changed the ink/toner and paper in the printers despite others telling me it is someone else's job. Maybe so, but I was the last one to use it and I know how to do it, and I'm sure they are busy too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great article. I agree totally with your remarks. We spend so much time trying to find someone else to take the blame that we lose the over all focus of what everyone is here for. To make the company successful. If everyone started to look at it from the view point of, "If I succeed, the company succeeds" More companies wouldn't find themselves in the turmoil you described. My article from today talks about knowing your people and putting your teams together effectively, which helps to eliminate a lot of the "Not my job" mentality. http://tinyurl.com/2e9y669

    ReplyDelete
  7. Of course, while reading this I was hearing Queen's "One Voice - One Vision" - (a powerful motivational tune) in my head sung by a chorus of committed coworkers. I love the concept in theory, but how does a company make this shift?

    For the CEO this requires very radical change, that begins with the hiring practices. How do you lure top talent with a job posting that has no role or title, and thus, no implied power & cachet with which to negotiate for top dollar & perks? The shift has to start by luring those who aren't overly attached to their titles at the outset.

    I believe visibility & accountability within the organization can foster some of this organically with collaboration systems that support cross-silo communications. If you have access to the documentation, processes - even the workflow of all relevant employee activity company-wide, it makes makes it much easier for all to take interest in, and ultimately more responsibility for every aspect of success, internally & externally.

    It is more than just a mindset shift from the top. The tools must be in place - and implemented to support the vision by making it not necessarily transparent, but at least translucent. I am not certain we can ever dispense with roles & titles, but I do know that providing a company with the right tools to fully collaborate on a shared vision does work.

    I wrote a bit about a former employer, who excels at silo-bashing by enabling people to work together as resources - not roles: http://thoughtelf.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/some-people-are-just-people-and-some-people-are-resources/

    I believe that is a necessary step in changing the mindset.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ted,
    You're on to something powerful in thinking about how people react to problems--or more broadly, how they see and take on priorities. If through a lens of title, the organization is in trouble. My interest for a few years now is in short-term, shared, cross-functional team goals as the guide to action, discussion, and shared motivation. When the Service team says "objectives related to us are on track, so how about if we send a swat team to support this quarter's sluggish sales," then you've got a new dynamic going on.

    Ken Rosen
    www.PerTalks.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. I disagree. Your recommendation does not begin to answer the questions that Kelly Craft (above) voices. It doesn’t even come close – actually it runs the other direction. Kelly’s questions are very logical questions that the approach you solution does not effectively address. The answer is not to get rid of titles, but to hold feet to the fire. Responsibility and authority for the company culture starts at the top and drives all the way to the bottom. The culture that has to flow down – it can not (like any river out there) flow up stream. Once the top takes this situation on openly and believes in the direction they need to be headed, then and only then will the rest of the organization do so.

    ReplyDelete